Radiation expert warns that 5g is a global disaster

A leading activist on the issue of electromagnetic radiation and its negative impacts on public health described the deployment of 5G as a "large-scale health experiment" that could "become a global catastrophe."
Robert Arthur Firstenberg is a recognized advocate of reducing the development of 5G networks in the United States and worldwide, saying the very high speed could cause cancer in humans and wildlife, and exacerbate the symptoms of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity .
In order to curb the deployment of networks, Firstenberg calls on the World Health Organization, the United Nations and the EU to "put an urgent end to the development of 5G". The petition had collected more than 40,000 signatures at the time of writing.
"The deployment of 5G is an experiment on humanity and the environment described as a crime under international law," says the petition. The deployment of the new network in the United States has already begun in cities like Houston, Indianapolis, Los Angeles and Sacramento.
"It could become a global disaster. When the first satellites were launched in the late 90s for mobile phones, the day of their launch, people sensitive to these phenomena have become seriously ill. The death rate has also increased by 5 to 10% in the United States and it has been reported that birds do not fly, "said Firstenberg to the Daily Star .
5G is the core technology of Smart Cities and the UN 2030 Agenda. A California city has blocked the project for health reasons , but will it stand up to Bill Clinton's 1996 Telecommunications Act, which says health problems can not be taken into account?
Firstenberg also states that in areas of the world where 5G antenna deployment has already begun, local people, including insects and other wildlife, are already sick. He claims to suffer from a condition called electromagnetic hypersensitivity , which causes symptoms such as dizziness, nausea, amnesia, insomnia, tremor, cardiac arrhythmia, acute and chronic pain, even if it is not scientifically or medically recognized.
In addition, Firstenberg filed a lawsuit claiming $ 1.43 million in damages to his neighbor for damaging his health using his iPhone and WiFi connection.
Just like cell phones in the 1980s and 1990s, 5G has been heavily criticized by the general public since its announcement. In September 2018, the Mill Valley City Council in California voted against the development of 5G towers and small cells in residential areas, citing "serious adverse health and environmental effects caused by micro-radiation. waves emitted by these small cell towers 4G and 5G ", reports .

However, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), "There is no scientific proof to answer this question in a definitive way ... It is necessary to continue the research before knowing whether the use of cell phones has health effects. "
Despite numerous large-scale studies of the potential effects of mobile phone radiation, showing no solid evidence of significant human health risks (not to mention insects), many in the scientific community remain skeptical about advantages of 5G technology outweighing potential damage to humans.
Two recent studies have also shown a high risk of developing cancerous tumors in male (although non-female) rats exposed to electromagnetic fields (EMF) nine hours a day for two years. However, the claims were not included in the double-blind follow-up tests.
215 scientists from 40 different countries have signed a call for international protection against non-ionizing exposure to electromagnetic fields, whose effects include, among others, "increased risk of cancer, cellular stress, increased free radicals adverse effects, genetic damage, structural and functional changes in the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders and negative impacts on overall well-being. "
In a letter , Dr. Martin Pall, professor of biochemistry at Washington State University, claimed that serious biological and health effects, including an increased risk of cancer by DNA mutations, due to exposure to networks 5G, while asserting that the FCC is a "ring agency" subject to the will of the same industry it is supposed to regulate.
The 5G would offer broadband speeds more than 100 times faster than current rates. But to facilitate its deployment, 300,000 new antennas would be needed only in the United States. This corresponds to roughly three decades of cell phone tower development.
Networks require a denser set of "small cell" sites because their high frequency waves allow for faster speeds but do not travel as far.
No comments:
Post a Comment